Solecismic Software
Solecismic Software  ·  Front Office Football  ·  The College Years  ·  Card Games  ·  Support  ·  Football Frontier  ·  Company

 

 

Football Frontier College Ratings

Since 1997, Solecismic Software has published a college football rating system. The system is designed to predict games, and has predicted the winner of Division I-A contests about 70% of the time.

The system received an overhaul for the 2007 season. As before, the system takes into account the final score of the game, but the law of diminishing returns applies. A couple of late touchdowns in a blowout have no effect on a team's ranking.

Starting in 2007, key statistics from each game are factored into the system. This should result in more dominant teams rising more quickly in the ratings, and will allow more precision in predicting scores.

RankTeamConf.RecordSchedule
Strength
Rating
1Louisiana StateSEC13-1698.8
2AlabamaSEC12-11998.2
3Boise StateMW 12-17793.8
4OregonP1212-23693.4
5MichiganB1011-23792.8
6OklahomaB1210-3391.9
7StanfordP1211-24691.0
8South CarolinaSEC11-22890.7
9Oklahoma StateB1212-1190.6
10ArkansasSEC11-22788.8
11HoustonUSA13-110188.6
12Texas ChristianMW 11-27988.4
13Southern CaliforniaP1210-22587.9
14Michigan StateB1011-34987.0
15GeorgiaSEC10-41886.6
16WisconsinB1011-34185.9
17TexasB128-5485.4
18BaylorB1210-31184.5
19Southern MississippiUSA12-210484.2
20MissouriB128-51083.3
21Kansas StateB1210-3982.3
22Virginia TechACC11-36882.1
23West VirginiaBE 10-36479.1
24Florida StateACC9-48777.5
25Texas A&MB127-6777.5
26CincinnatiBE 10-37574.9
27Brigham YoungInd10-38974.9
28Penn StateB109-43974.6
29NebraskaB109-43374.0
30Northern IlllinoisMAC11-310773.6
31UtahP128-55473.0
32Notre DameInd8-53071.5
33RutgersBE 9-47271.2
34TulsaUSA8-54268.9
35OhioMAC10-411666.1
36Mississippi StateSEC7-63866.0
37TempleMAC9-411765.2
38AuburnSEC8-51365.2
39FloridaSEC7-62165.0
40ToledoMAC9-49464.6
41VanderbiltSEC6-73164.2
42Louisiana TechWAC8-58462.7
43IllinoisB107-66960.9
44Georgia TechACC8-58259.7
45Southern MethodistUSA8-55559.3
46Arizona StateP126-72959.0
47CaliforniaP127-63258.8
48ClemsonACC10-44058.7
49Arkansas StateSB 10-311358.3
50North CarolinaACC7-65157.2
51Miami (Florida)ACC6-65956.0
52South FloridaBE 5-76054.8
53WashingtonP127-62354.6
54Iowa StateB126-7554.5
55Louisiana - LafayetteSB 9-411254.4
56IowaB107-64753.8
57TennesseeSEC5-71652.9
58LouisvilleBE 7-65051.8
59NevadaWAC7-68151.0
60Ohio StateB106-72050.3
61Texas TechB125-71449.4
62ArizonaP124-81748.9
63VirginiaACC8-58048.8
64San Diego StateMW 8-510847.5
65MarshallUSA7-63546.6
66UCLAP126-8846.1
67Florida InternationalSB 8-512046.0
68North Carolina StateACC8-59744.7
69PurdueB107-66542.4
70Utah StateWAC7-611042.2
71Western MichiganMAC7-68642.2
72Air ForceMW 7-610640.7
73PittsburghBE 6-74338.9
74KentuckySEC5-73438.6
75Central FloridaUSA5-79838.5
76NorthwesternB106-76138.4
77Wake ForestACC6-77036.6
78Ball StateMAC6-65635.8
79NavyInd5-76335.7
80SyracuseBE 5-75334.2
81WyomingMW 8-510033.7
82ConnecticutBE 5-75233.6
83Oregon StateP123-91533.4
84Western KentuckySB 7-511533.3
85Kent StateMAC5-75733.2
86San Jose StateWAC5-78530.1
87Eastern MichiganMAC6-69629.4
88KansasB122-10227.9
89HawaiiWAC6-711827.7
90RiceUSA4-82426.1
91East CarolinaUSA5-76625.4
92Louisiana - MonroeSB 4-89925.3
93Miami (Ohio)MAC4-87124.9
94Bowling GreenMAC5-79024.3
95Texas - El PasoUSA5-710324.1
96MinnesotaB103-92623.9
97ColoradoP123-102223.9
98North TexasSB 5-77822.8
99ArmyInd3-97320.4
100Washington StateP124-84819.4
101Boston CollegeACC4-86718.5
102MississippiSEC2-101217.6
103Fresno StateWAC4-99516.6
104BuffaloMAC3-910515.0
105MarylandACC2-104514.7
106DukeACC3-96214.0
107New Mexico StateWAC4-99113.1
108Central MichiganMAC3-97411.9
109Nevada - Las VegasMW 2-107610.5
110Colorado StateMW 3-91098.8
111Alabama - BirminghamUSA3-9888.0
112Middle Tennessee StateSB 2-101146.4
113IdahoWAC2-10926.2
114IndianaB101-11446.2
115TroySB 3-9936.1
116Florida AtlanticSB 1-11834.0
117TulaneUSA2-111193.1
118AkronMAC1-111022.6
119MemphisUSA2-101112.4
120New MexicoMW 1-11581.7

Explanation of Football Frontier Ratings

The ratings system is based on an assessment of each game played between two Division I-A college football teams.

The final score matters, but since the game score is curved using a "normal" distribution and there's a limit to how high a game score a team can achieve, running up the score doesn't make much difference.

A home-field advantage is built into the system, and a team's ranking in several key offensive and defensive statistics is built into the system. To further mitigate the effects of luck in a final score, the team's strength of schedule is also factored in.

Once the game scores have been adjusted, I set up a grid of all 120 Division I-A teams and compare each team to every other team, passing through as many relevant game scores as possible. The algorithm will use as many as seven steps to make a comparison between two teams. Shorter links, with the shortest being an actual game between the two teams, are given precedence over longer links.

I then rate the teams based on the percentage of favorable comparisons between teams. A perfect score of 100 means that team has a positive game score in comparison to all 119 possible Division I-A opponents, as well as a maximum score in the offense and defense ratings.

For the first six weeks of the season, last year's rating, modified by the number of returning starters, is used as a diminishing portion of each team's rating.

Copyright © Solecismic Software, 2011. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Solecismic Software

Solecismic Software

Football Frontier

Pro Football Ratings

Schedule

Standings

Teams

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

College Football Ratings

Schedule

Schedule Strength

Standings

Conference Ratings

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

Football Frontier Blog

Up and Down the River

Front Office Football

The College Years

Company Information