Solecismic Software
Solecismic Software  ·  Front Office Football  ·  The College Years  ·  Card Games  ·  Support  ·  Football Frontier  ·  Company

 

 

Football Frontier College Ratings

Since 1997, Solecismic Software has published a college football rating system. The system is designed to predict games, and has predicted the winner of Division I-A contests about 70% of the time.

The system received an overhaul for the 2007 season. As before, the system takes into account the final score of the game, but the law of diminishing returns applies. A couple of late touchdowns in a blowout have no effect on a team's ranking.

Starting in 2007, key statistics from each game are factored into the system. This should result in more dominant teams rising more quickly in the ratings, and will allow more precision in predicting scores. Because of this, we will track our performance against the point spread this season.

RankTeamConf.RecordSchedule
Strength
Rating
1AlabamaSEC14-01098.7
2FloridaSEC13-12898.4
3Ohio StateB1011-24396.7
4TexasB1213-14294.9
5Virginia TechACC10-32194.2
6Texas ChristianMW 12-16893.9
7Boise StateWAC14-010392.0
8OregonPAC10-3191.2
9PittsburghBE 10-33490.4
10Penn StateB1011-27789.7
11CincinnatiBE 12-13889.5
12IowaB1011-23788.0
13Southern CaliforniaPAC9-41185.1
14WisconsinB1010-35884.8
15Miami (Florida)ACC9-41384.7
16Georgia TechACC11-32482.7
17Louisiana StateSEC9-41482.2
18MississippiSEC9-45481.4
19NebraskaB1210-45180.4
20OklahomaB128-51880.4
21Brigham YoungMW 11-28180.1
22ClemsonACC9-53979.7
23ArkansasSEC8-51279.6
24UtahMW 10-36479.1
25Oklahoma StateB129-45277.8
26North CarolinaACC8-53377.4
27ConnecticutBE 8-52077.4
28West VirginiaBE 9-43176.3
29GeorgiaSEC8-5876.3
30AuburnSEC8-52575.5
31CaliforniaPAC8-53273.2
32Central MichiganMAC12-211572.9
33NavyInd10-47471.6
34StanfordPAC8-53071.5
35RutgersBE 9-48571.4
36ArizonaPAC8-5471.4
37Texas TechB129-45769.1
38South FloridaBE 8-54869.0
39Oregon StatePAC8-51768.9
40Air ForceMW 8-57868.4
41TennesseeSEC7-61667.8
42UCLAPAC7-61566.9
43TempleMAC9-411663.3
44Boston CollegeACC8-54761.9
45Florida StateACC7-6361.4
46South CarolinaSEC7-6760.4
47MissouriB128-56658.5
48Middle Tennessee StateSB 10-311957.4
49HoustonUSA10-49057.1
50Notre DameInd6-63656.4
51East CarolinaUSA9-56356.3
52KentuckySEC7-64155.3
53Mississippi StateSEC5-7555.2
54Southern MississippiUSA7-610052.4
55NorthwesternB108-58451.5
56Texas A&MB126-74449.4
57TroySB 9-49249.1
58WashingtonPAC5-7648.7
59Arizona StatePAC4-81948.5
60MinnesotaB106-72947.9
61Central FloridaUSA8-58247.6
62Iowa StateB127-67347.4
63Kansas StateB126-67147.0
64MarshallUSA7-68845.6
65NevadaWAC8-59645.0
66Michigan StateB106-75044.2
67Fresno StateWAC8-58743.6
68North Carolina StateACC5-75343.4
69IdahoWAC8-510642.5
70Southern MethodistUSA8-59441.5
71OhioMAC9-510841.1
72MichiganB105-76740.9
73Wake ForestACC5-74039.2
74LouisvilleBE 4-8938.3
75Bowling GreenMAC7-69537.3
76Louisiana - MonroeSB 6-611037.0
77BaylorB124-82636.7
78KansasB125-75536.6
79PurdueB105-74936.1
80Alabama - BirminghamUSA5-78634.7
81HawaiiWAC6-710134.6
82BuffaloMAC5-710734.2
83Northern IlllinoisMAC7-610933.2
84SyracuseBE 4-82232.9
85WyomingMW 7-68032.1
86DukeACC5-77531.2
87VirginiaACC3-92328.0
88Utah StateWAC4-87927.8
89Louisiana TechWAC4-86227.6
90TulsaUSA5-710426.9
91ToledoMAC5-711126.2
92Colorado StateMW 3-98324.1
93IndianaB104-86023.0
94Nevada - Las VegasMW 5-77022.6
95Florida AtlanticSB 5-710522.3
96IllinoisB103-94521.8
97ArmyInd5-711221.1
98San Diego StateMW 4-87620.9
99Kent StateMAC5-711819.4
100Western MichiganMAC5-712017.9
101Louisiana - LafayetteSB 6-610217.6
102ColoradoB123-93517.6
103Texas - El PasoUSA4-811417.1
104VanderbiltSEC2-102717.1
105MarylandACC2-104616.8
106Arkansas StateSB 4-89716.0
107Washington StatePAC1-11214.6
108MemphisUSA2-106511.4
109TulaneUSA3-98910.0
110Miami (Ohio)MAC1-11619.7
111AkronMAC3-9918.2
112Florida InternationalSB 3-9727.4
113North TexasSB 2-101177.0
114San Jose StateWAC2-10595.6
115New MexicoMW 1-11565.5
116RiceUSA2-10695.2
117Ball StateMAC2-101135.0
118New Mexico StateWAC3-10984.1
119Western KentuckySB 0-12992.9
120Eastern MichiganMAC0-12931.2

Explanation of Football Frontier Ratings

The ratings system is based on an assessment of each game played between two Division I-A college football teams.

The final score matters, but since the game score is curved using a "normal" distribution and there's a limit to how high a game score a team can achieve, running up the score doesn't make much difference.

A home-field advantage is built into the system, and a team's ranking in several key offensive and defensive statistics is built into the system. To further mitigate the effects of luck in a final score, the team's strength of schedule is also factored in.

Once the game scores have been adjusted, I set up a grid of all 119 Division I-A teams and compare each team to every other team, passing through as many relevant game scores as possible. The algorithm will use as many as seven steps to make a comparison between two teams. Shorter links, with the shortest being an actual game between the two teams, are given precedence over longer links.

I then rate the teams based on the percentage of favorable comparisons between teams. A perfect score of 100 means that team has a positive game score in comparison to all 119 possible Division I-A opponents, as well as a maximum score in the offense and defense ratings.

For the first six weeks of the season, last year's rating, modified by the number of returning starters, is used as a diminishing portion of each team's rating.

Copyright © Solecismic Software, 2010. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Solecismic Software

Solecismic Software

Football Frontier

Pro Football Ratings

Schedule

Standings

Teams

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

College Football Ratings

Schedule

Schedule Strength

Standings

Conference Ratings

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

Football Frontier Blog

Up and Down the River

Front Office Football

The College Years

Company Information