Solecismic Software
Solecismic Software  ·  Front Office Football  ·  The College Years  ·  Card Games  ·  Support  ·  Football Frontier  ·  Company

 

 

Football Frontier College Ratings

Since 1997, Solecismic Software has published a college football rating system. The system is designed to predict games, and has predicted the winner of Division I-A contests about 70% of the time.

The system received an overhaul for the 2007 season. As before, the system takes into account the final score of the game, but the law of diminishing returns applies. A couple of late touchdowns in a blowout have no effect on a team's ranking.

Starting in 2007, key statistics from each game are factored into the system. This should result in more dominant teams rising more quickly in the ratings, and will allow more precision in predicting scores. Because of this, we will track our performance against the point spread this season.

RankTeamConf.RecordSchedule
Strength
Rating
1Louisiana StateSEC12-21198.0
2GeorgiaSEC11-21697.4
3West VirginiaBE 11-23396.0
4MissouriB1212-23195.7
5Southern CaliforniaP1011-22194.9
6OregonP109-4394.2
7Ohio StateB1011-25694.0
8KansasB1212-16693.3
9FloridaSEC9-4491.9
10Virginia TechACC11-33690.5
11CincinnatiBE 10-36189.3
12OklahomaB1211-33788.5
13TexasB1210-34887.4
14Boston CollegeACC11-35285.4
15South FloridaBE 9-42785.1
16MichiganB109-43984.9
17Arizona StateP1010-31783.2
18TennesseeSEC10-4782.1
19Brigham YoungMW 11-25981.9
20ClemsonACC9-44681.8
21Penn StateB109-46281.8
22Oregon StateP109-4681.5
23AuburnSEC9-41479.7
24IllinoisB109-44579.2
25UtahMW 9-45779.1
26KentuckySEC8-51875.3
27CaliforniaP107-61274.7
28Wake ForestACC9-45174.6
29HawaiiWAC12-111370.5
30RutgersBE 8-56570.5
31ArkansasSEC8-53070.3
32Oklahoma StateB127-62870.2
33AlabamaSEC7-62070.1
34WisconsinB109-45567.9
35Texas ChristianMW 8-56967.7
36Central FloridaUSA10-48066.4
37Florida StateACC7-62266.0
38Texas TechB129-46465.7
39TulsaUSA10-49165.3
40VirginiaACC9-46064.6
41East CarolinaUSA8-57964.4
42Texas A&MB127-62563.4
43Mississippi StateSEC8-52462.9
44UCLAP106-7162.8
45Air ForceMW 9-47262.3
46ConnecticutBE 9-45862.2
47Michigan StateB107-65061.8
48Boise StateWAC10-310761.6
49Fresno StateWAC9-49461.0
50TroySBT8-48360.6
51South CarolinaSEC6-6959.3
52PurdueB108-57058.9
53New MexicoMW 9-48156.8
54ArizonaP105-7556.5
55LouisvilleBE 6-63254.1
56NavyInd8-510053.2
57Georgia TechACC7-65352.5
58NebraskaB125-71351.7
59ColoradoB126-72651.6
60MarylandACC6-73449.9
61VanderbiltSEC5-72348.0
62Kansas StateB125-74147.4
63Central MichiganMAC8-610546.7
64WyomingMW 5-76846.6
65WashingtonP104-9246.5
66HoustonUSA8-58546.2
67PittsburghBE 5-74045.4
68Southern MississippiUSA7-68843.7
69Florida AtlanticSBT8-58243.4
70IowaB106-67743.4
71Washington StateP105-71542.6
72IndianaB107-67141.7
73Ball StateMAC7-610239.6
74Miami (Florida)ACC5-74936.3
75Louisiana-MonroeSBT6-68635.7
76North Carolina StateACC5-73535.0
77MississippiSEC3-91033.9
78NorthwesternB106-67332.8
79StanfordP104-8832.7
80North CarolinaACC4-84730.7
81ToledoMAC5-711429.3
82Texas-El PasoUSA4-89029.3
83Colorado StateMW 3-95429.0
84Western MichiganMAC5-79928.1
85Middle Tennessee StateSBT5-79628.1
86Arkansas StateSBT5-79727.1
87Iowa StateB123-94326.3
88OhioMAC6-611925.8
89MemphisUSA7-611125.6
90MarshallUSA3-97525.0
91San Diego StateMW 4-84424.6
92NevadaWAC6-710924.4
93Bowling GreenMAC8-511823.5
94Notre DameInd3-91923.4
95Miami (Ohio)MAC6-710820.8
96SyracuseBE 2-102920.5
97Nevada-Las VegasMW 2-106320.3
98TulaneUSA4-89318.7
99Louisiana TechWAC5-78717.9
100San Jose StateWAC5-710117.6
101BaylorB123-94217.6
102AkronMAC4-811017.3
103RiceUSA3-99513.6
104BuffaloMAC5-711213.3
105TempleMAC4-811613.2
106DukeACC1-113813.1
107Eastern MichiganMAC4-810312.8
108MinnesotaB101-116712.4
109Louisiana-LafayetteSBT3-99212.0
110Kent StateMAC3-911510.5
111ArmyInd3-97810.1
112New Mexico StateWAC4-91069.9
113Southern MethodistUSA1-11898.8
114Utah StateWAC2-10846.5
115Northern IllinoisMAC2-101174.0
116Alabama-BirminghamUSA2-10743.8
117IdahoWAC1-111043.6
118North TexasSBT2-10981.9
119Florida InternationalSBT1-11761.9

Explanation of Football Frontier Ratings

The ratings system is based on an assessment of each game played between two Division I-A college football teams.

The final score matters, but since the game score is curved using a "normal" distribution and there's a limit to how high a game score a team can achieve, running up the score doesn't make much difference.

A home-field advantage is built into the system, and a team's ranking in several key offensive and defensive statistics is built into the system. To further mitigate the effects of luck in a final score, the team's strength of schedule is also factored in.

Once the game scores have been adjusted, I set up a grid of all 119 Division I-A teams and compare each team to every other team, passing through as many relevant game scores as possible. The algorithm will use as many as seven steps to make a comparison between two teams. Shorter links, with the shortest being an actual game between the two teams, are given precedence over longer links.

I then rate the teams based on the percentage of favorable comparisons between teams. A perfect score of 100 means that team has a positive game score in comparison to all 118 possible Division I-A opponents, as well as a maximum score in the offense and defense ratings.

For the first six weeks of the season, last year's rating, modified by the number of returning starters, is used as a diminishing portion of each team's rating.

Copyright © Solecismic Software, 2008. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Solecismic Software

Solecismic Software

Football Frontier

Pro Football Ratings

Schedule

Standings

Teams

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

NFL Player Analysis

College Football Ratings

Schedule

Standings

Conference Ratings

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

Football Frontier Blog

Up and Down the River

Front Office Football

The College Years

Company Information