Solecismic Software
Solecismic Software  ·  Front Office Football  ·  The College Years  ·  Card Games  ·  Support  ·  Football Frontier  ·  Company

 

 

Football Frontier College Ratings

Since 1997, Solecismic Software has published a college football rating system. The system is designed to predict games, and has predicted the winner of Division I-A contests about 70% of the time.

The system received an overhaul for the 2007 season. As before, the system takes into account the final score of the game, but the law of diminishing returns applies. A couple of late touchdowns in a blowout have no effect on a team's ranking.

Starting in 2007, key statistics from each game are factored into the system. This should result in more dominant teams rising more quickly in the ratings, and will allow more precision in predicting scores.

RankTeamConf.RecordSchedule
Strength
Rating
1AlabamaSEC13-12299.0
2OregonP1212-13597.4
3FloridaSEC11-2295.7
4Texas A&MSEC11-21895.3
5Ohio StateB1012-05694.5
6Notre DameInd12-11693.2
7Kansas StateB1211-22992.5
8GeorgiaSEC12-23092.2
9Florida StateACC12-27790.2
10StanfordP1212-2789.9
11South CarolinaSEC11-21189.8
12Louisiana StateSEC10-32688.7
13ClemsonACC11-26387.7
14San Jose StateWAC11-27887.0
15Utah StateWAC11-28986.9
16NorthwesternB1010-35184.0
17Oklahoma StateB128-53283.5
18NebraskaB1010-4482.3
19Oregon StateP129-41082.3
20VanderbiltSEC9-44381.6
21Arkansas State SB10-37479.1
22TexasB129-41778.1
23UCLAP129-53476.7
24TulsaUSA11-310476.6
25BaylorB128-52576.6
26WisconsinB108-62476.4
27Penn StateB108-45775.3
28Michigan StateB107-62075.2
29OklahomaB1210-31374.8
30Boise State MW11-211774.4
31Louisville BE11-27674.2
32Cincinnati BE10-39473.7
33MichiganB108-5973.7
34ArizonaP128-52773.3
35Central FloridaUSA10-48173.0
36Northern IllinoisMAC12-212369.8
37Louisiana TechWAC9-310568.7
38Brigham YoungInd8-55268.3
39North CarolinaACC8-410067.7
40Virginia TechACC7-64465.7
41MissouriSEC5-7165.6
42MississippiSEC7-62365.1
43Texas ChristianB127-62164.9
44Arizona StateP128-55464.3
45Rutgers BE9-48363.8
46Kent StateMAC11-310663.6
47Syracuse BE8-54963.2
48Texas TechB128-54763.0
49Mississippi StateSEC8-54162.1
50Fresno State MW9-49161.7
51Southern CaliforniaP127-61461.1
52Georgia TechACC7-73958.8
53San Diego State MW9-411158.7
54OhioMAC9-412256.9
55Ball StateMAC9-47555.9
56ToledoMAC9-49555.7
57Miami (Florida)ACC7-55055.4
58WashingtonP127-62854.5
59West VirginiaB127-64054.4
60Pittsburgh BE6-76053.8
61Bowling GreenMAC8-59350.8
62Louisiana - Lafayette SB9-49949.7
63TennesseeSEC5-71949.5
64NavyInd8-59049.2
65Southern MethodistUSA7-67349.0
66Iowa StateB126-71247.6
67Middle Tennessee State SB8-410947.2
68Western Kentucky SB7-69645.0
69MinnesotaB106-76242.8
70ArkansasSEC4-8842.6
71RiceUSA7-611442.3
72UtahP125-73641.3
73Troy SB5-711241.2
74Louisiana - Monroe SB8-59239.8
75North Carolina StateACC7-66439.6
76AuburnSEC3-9537.5
77PurdueB106-75335.9
78KentuckySEC2-10635.6
79CaliforniaP123-91534.8
80Nevada MW7-612134.4
81IowaB104-84534.1
82Texas - San AntonioWAC8-412433.7
83Connecticut BE5-78233.5
84VirginiaACC4-85933.5
85East CarolinaUSA8-511332.8
86DukeACC6-73731.6
87Wake ForestACC5-75830.2
88Central MichiganMAC7-611829.9
89MarylandACC4-86928.8
90MemphisUSA4-811527.0
91South Florida BE3-94826.5
92Temple BE4-76526.1
93Washington StateP123-93824.6
94HoustonUSA5-710324.5
95MarshallUSA5-710723.8
96IndianaB104-85522.3
97Colorado State MW4-89722.3
98BuffaloMAC4-87222.0
99North Texas SB4-86721.9
100Florida International SB3-98820.4
101Air Force MW6-711920.2
102Miami (Ohio)MAC4-86620.2
103Texas - El PasoUSA3-97019.5
104New Mexico MW4-912019.2
105Texas StateWAC4-88718.9
106KansasB121-11317.6
107Western MichiganMAC4-811615.6
108Wyoming MW4-811015.4
109Alabama - BirminghamUSA3-97915.0
110IllinoisB102-103114.5
111Boston CollegeACC2-104213.7
112ArmyInd2-1010212.1
113Eastern MichiganMAC2-107111.0
114ColoradoP121-11339.8
115Florida Atlantic SB3-9688.2
116Nevada - Las Vegas MW2-11988.0
117Hawai'i MW3-91017.7
118TulaneUSA2-10865.2
119South Alabama SB2-111084.5
120Southern MississippiUSA0-12614.5
121IdahoWAC1-11463.8
122MassachusettsMAC1-11852.7
123New Mexico StateWAC1-11842.1
124AkronMAC1-11801.9

Explanation of Football Frontier Ratings

The ratings system is based on an assessment of each game played between two Division I-A college football teams.

The final score matters, but since the game score is curved using a "normal" distribution and there's a limit to how high a game score a team can achieve, running up the score doesn't make much difference.

A home-field advantage is built into the system, and a team's ranking in several key offensive and defensive statistics is built into the system. To further mitigate the effects of luck in a final score, the team's strength of schedule is also factored in.

Once the game scores have been adjusted, I set up a grid of all 124 Division I-A teams and compare each team to every other team, passing through as many relevant game scores as possible. The algorithm will use as many as seven steps to make a comparison between two teams. Shorter links, with the shortest being an actual game between the two teams, are given precedence over longer links.

I then rate the teams based on the percentage of favorable comparisons between teams. A perfect score of 100 means that team has a positive game score in comparison to all 123 possible Division I-A opponents, as well as a maximum score in the offense and defense ratings.

For the first six weeks of the season, last year's rating, modified by the number of returning starters, is used as a diminishing portion of each team's rating.

Copyright © Solecismic Software, 2012. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Solecismic Software

Solecismic Software

Football Frontier

Pro Football Ratings

Schedule

Standings

Teams

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

College Football Ratings

Schedule

Schedule Strength

Standings

Conference Ratings

Stats - Offense

Stats - Defense

System Performance

Football Frontier Blog

Up and Down the River

Front Office Football

The College Years

Company Information